FITC vs Alexa 488

From: John Krowka (jkrowka@biotechimaging.com)
Date: Thu Mar 21 2002 - 11:58:25 EST

Next message: ray hester: "getting antibodies into viable cells"
Previous message: Efros, Lyubov: "Basophills"
Next in thread: Moss, Delynn M.: "RE: FITC vs Alexa 488"
Maybe reply: Moss, Delynn M.: "RE: FITC vs Alexa 488"
Maybe reply: Laird Bloom: "RE: FITC vs Alexa 488"
Reply: Howard T Petrie: "Re: FITC vs Alexa 488"
Reply: Richard Haugland: "Re: FITC vs Alexa 488"
Reply: William Telford: "Re: FITC vs Alexa 488"
Reply: Matthias Haury: "Re: FITC vs Alexa 488"
Maybe reply: Matthias Haury: "Re: FITC vs Alexa 488"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Molecular Probes' website are claims that Alexa 488 is 6-7 times brighter
than FITC. Preliminary evidence from our conjugations of the same antibody
with FITC or Alexa 488 indicate no advantage from using Alexa 488. Can
anyone who compared Alexa 488 and FITC share their findings?

Next message: ray hester: "getting antibodies into viable cells"
Previous message: Efros, Lyubov: "Basophills"
Next in thread: Moss, Delynn M.: "RE: FITC vs Alexa 488"
Maybe reply: Moss, Delynn M.: "RE: FITC vs Alexa 488"
Maybe reply: Laird Bloom: "RE: FITC vs Alexa 488"
Reply: Howard T Petrie: "Re: FITC vs Alexa 488"
Reply: Richard Haugland: "Re: FITC vs Alexa 488"
Reply: William Telford: "Re: FITC vs Alexa 488"
Reply: Matthias Haury: "Re: FITC vs Alexa 488"
Maybe reply: Matthias Haury: "Re: FITC vs Alexa 488"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 05 2003 - 19:26:04 EST