Re: help - fixative issue?

From: bcotleur (bunny@cotleur.com)
Date: Tue Jun 25 2002 - 21:58:33 EST


Macie et al-
This brings up another hot topic-- the length of time fixed samples can be
successfully analyzed.  Richard Meister just posted that he can store fixed
samples for ONE YEAR.  (My hat is off to you Richard- but I have never been
that lucky). Loss of fluorescence wasn't my problem- it was the increased
auto/background fluorescence that haunts me.

Over & over I've seen in papers/emails /posted  protocols that fixed samples
can easily be stored for periods of time ranging from days to weeks (and now a
year). Yet I have witnessed exactly what you posted in your attachment. Within
24 hr I can pick up subtle increases in fluoresence. By 3 days I usually have
to decrease the PMT's so much/increase the comp tons/   I doubt the validity of
some of my positives-especially the dim/"shoulder" type positives.  (I'm
generally running  human lysed whole blood or PBMC's, and just for the extra
2cents- the scatter actually looks great).  I also notice that the  monocytes
seem to brighten/move up the scale much more than the lymphs, and that on the
unstained/control samples FL1 shifts the most, the Fl3, then Fl2.

I've tried every protocol I've seen: 0.5%,1%,2% fresh PFA, with and w/o post
fix washing in PBS/2%serum;  0.5%, 1%,2% EM grade formaldehyde (both stored in
the fix and also washed after fixation just like the PFA).
I've scrupulously monitored the pH, kept the stuff in brown bottles,  made
small batched and big batches,used it fresh and used it 1 week old- I don't get
the voodoo involved here.
I now stick with the EMgrade formaldehyde from Polysci(1%) and run my samples
<36hr. Since I'm running chemokine analysis-(which often are not completely
separated positives such as Tcell markers) on patients on Rx Tx-I'm not
comfortable  having the cells shifting up during storage and figuring out what
is artifact and what is response to Tx.

If anyone out in flow-land has the secret key to fixation- I would love to hear
it.  And if there is a trick to analyzing samples with increased background
(due to storage)-I would love to be enlightened!

--bunny---
******all fixed up & nowhere to go!*****



maciej simm wrote:

> Dear group,
>
> In the attached word file (virus free to the best of my knowledge) I am
> showing two acquisitions of the same file. It was fixed in the 0.75% PFA
> with 1% HAB serum final in PBS recipe. I don't think its working because the
> same instrument settings show a huge difference in fluorescent distribution.
> Does anyone else experience this drag-up with their fixatives? are there any
> fixatives which don't do this as much?
>
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>    Part 1.2Type: Macintosh File

--
Bunny Cotleur, M.S.
Sr. Technologist
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Neurosciences   NC30
9500 Euclid Avenue
Cleveland, OH 44195
cotleur@ccf.org
(216) 444-1164
fax (216) 444-7197



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 05 2003 - 19:26:14 EST