Re: Microparticle Analysis Using FACScan/Sort

From: Mark A. KuKuruga (kukuru@umich.edu)
Date: Fri Apr 02 1999 - 18:14:22 EST


laurie_stojanovic@baxter.com wrote:

> Has anyone out there used a Becton Dickinson FACScan or FACSort flow
> cytometer to analyze platelet- or WBC-derived microparticles (0.2-1.0 um in
> size)?  I am looking for assistance in the following arenas:
>      1.  Distinguishing background (noise) events from "real" microparticle
> events; looking for ways to increase the limit of  sensitivity of these
> instruments (Becton Dickinson Suggests limit is 0.5 to 1.0 um).
>      2.  Setting used during acquisition; especially, threshold trigger (FSC
> or FL) and values thereof
>      3.  Gating strategies
>      4.  Sample collection and staining

Laurie,
Can't say on the BD, since I haven't tried, but I have done similar analysis on
my Coulter equipment (Elite ESP and EPICS XL).
I think that the suggested limit of about 0.5um may apply . . . you have to try
it.  I do know that I was able to resolve a 0.1um particle on my XL (the Elite
had a limit of about 0.2um), but that was using a fluorescent particle.
Triggering on fluorescence will dramatically improve your ability to resolve
these smaller particles, providing the fluorescence is bright.  (I think a
limiting factor here is size as well . . . smaller particles by default carry
lower amts. of dye, so don't achieve a high enough total fluorescence to
resolve over background)
You need to run your particle suspension buffer to establish background, then
look for a particle peak greater that that defined limit using a live gate.
Hope this moves you in the right direction.
MAK.
--
Mark A. KuKuruga, Managing Director
University of Michigan Core Flow Cytometry
kukuruga@medmail.med.umich.edu



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 03 2002 - 11:53:20 EST