Non-specific staining of nuclei

From: Andrea Dewar (andrea.dewar@imvs.sa.gov.au)
Date: Tue May 28 2002 - 01:00:05 EST


Hi there,

I'm trying to analyse the expression of transcription factors in nuclei
using flow cytometry, but am having lots of trouble with non-specific
staining.

The primary antibodies I am using are purified rabbit polyclonals (which I
know are notorious for being sticky), and the second step is goat
anti-rabbit-PE.  I have titrated the primary and secondary antibodies, and
have found that I need to use 1ug/mL of primary antibody/10-6 cells to get
decent separation of my antibody and isotype control (decreasing the
concentration of my antibody only decreased the intensity of my antibody of
interest, and not the isotype control).  When I have set the flow cytometer
up using an unstained sample, my isotype control sits at around 40 (log
scale), and my antibody of interest sits at around 400, and I know that this
is sufficient separation, but I would ideally like to reduce my non-specific
staining.

My secondary step alone does not give any significant level of staining, so
I know it's the rabbit polyclonal that's being a pain.

I have incubated the nuclei in a blocking buffer containing 4% human
serum/5% FCS/0.4%BSA/5% goat serum, but this had no success in reducing the
non-specific staining.

All washes have been performed using Hanks/0.1%BSA/0.1%azide/0.005%NP-40,
and the nuclei have been prepared, fixed and permeabilised using NP-40,
paraformaldehyde and tween-20 respectively.

Any suggestions on how I can reduce this non-specific staining would be
greatly appreciated!!

Thanks!

Andrea Dewar
PhD Student
Leukaemia Research Laboratory
Department of Haematology
Institute of Medical and Veterinary Science
Adelaide
South Australia  5000
AUSTRALIA



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 05 2003 - 19:26:11 EST