256 vs. 1024 channels

From: Donnenberg, Albert (donnenbergad@MSX.UPMC.EDU)
Date: Tue Mar 19 2002 - 17:44:26 EST


After-the-fact software compensation requires un-logging, subtraction, and
re-logging.  1024 channels of resolution is a bit sparse for this, but it
works fairly well.  Lower than 1024 would be too coarse.  You can always
lower your resolution during analysis (e.g. for smoothing) but you can never
increase it. Life is short, memory is cheap.

Albert Donnenberg
University of Pittsburgh



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 05 2003 - 19:26:03 EST