Re: Flow on Nematode eggs

From: David Coder (d_coder@MSN.com)
Date: Thu Feb 28 2002 - 16:51:06 EST


If you can see the eggs they're at least 100 micrometers, perhaps bigger.
Particle size should be at most 50% of orifice, so they may be compatible
with the standard cuvette in BD benchtop instruments. Also,  keeping
concentration to about a million per mL should work. If there is breakup of
the eggs, free DNA can make a mess. If you have good staining the eggs
should be bright in a fluorescence microscope (blue excitation; orange to
red emission)--always a good way see labeling problems. In addition, you can
estimate size at low magnification.

Dave
========================================
David M. Coder, Ph.D.,
Consultant in Cytometry
email: d_coder@msn.com or dcoder1@hotmail.com
tel./messages: 206-499-3446
----- Original Message -----
From: "janet dow" <jldow@unity.ncsu.edu>
To: cyto-inbox
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 7:26 AM
Subject: Flow on Nematode eggs


>
> I have a client who wish to run flow on nematode eggs (Meloidigyne
> incognita and Meloidigyne hapla) to stain to look at genome size.  We have
> tried twice to run them and the first time saw no florescence so we change
> protocols to PI but the second time we clogged both my machines with the
> samples( I am using a BD FACScan and a FACSCalibur).   Can anyone help
> us-she has found a paper from 1984 which used flow on a machine made at
Los
> Alamos but it doesn't specify what size nozzle they used.  She also does
> not know how big the eggs are but you can visualize them in the solution
> and they settle out of solution very quickly.
>
>
> thank you in advance for all your help-I have always had such great luck
> with questions on this group.
>
> Sincerely
>
> Janet Dow
>
>
> Janet Dow
> Research Technician and Manager
> Flow Cytometry Facility
> North Carolina State College of Veterinary Medicine
> Room C-314
> Raleigh, NC 27606
> (919)513-6364
>
>
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 05 2003 - 19:26:01 EST