Re: Sort purity

From: Jens Fleischer (jfleischer@tesionmail.de)
Date: Mon Nov 05 2001 - 13:01:11 EST


In my humble opinion we have to consider various effects:

1. As David McFarland correctly described, our populations are most
often (always?, don't nail me on this, this would be another endless
thread...) gaussian distributions, thus if you sort a "histogram
shoulder" you will always get again a gaussian distribution and nothing
between "goal posts". Recently I saw a software package that nicely
calculated the possible gaussain distributions under an
immunfluorescence curve, similar as the modelling for cell cycle
analysis. I do not know when and how this will be commercially
available.

2. Als Volker Eckstein wrote, loss of fluoresence and bleaching can have
a serious impact, for example PerCP is quite sensible for this. He also
mentioned the gaussian distribution by telling that a cell never falls
into the same fluorescence channel if you measure it several times.

3. We should also not forget the formation of doublets in the primary
sample which fall apart after sorting and washing the sorted fractions.
Ideally, possible aggregates should be excluded from the sorting
process. However, this is often not possible using the traditional
scatter height signals. Depending on the orientation while going through
the beam intercept you cannot resolve all aggregates by comparing the
height. Optimally, one should use the area signals also for scatter AND
fluorescence.

4. Electronics: I do not think that there are really bugs in the sorting
electronics of any vendor (we would definitely have realized it before).
If your machine can sort beads 100% pure there is no reason why it
should not be able to do this with cells. So sample preparation and
sorting conditions (sample/sorted fractions warm/cool, flow rate above
threshold, sort rate, abort rate, sorted drops, coincidence) play the
most important role.

And by the way, don't forget to do some extensive washing before you
reanalyse your sorted cells again on the very same machine you sorted
them. The sample tubing can be a steady fountain of cells after three
hours of sorting...


Jens Fleischer



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 05 2003 - 19:01:37 EST