Re: Rhodamine

From: Mark Kukuruga (kukuru@med.umich.edu)
Date: Thu Mar 29 2001 - 18:30:00 EST


Muhammad,
Which rhodamine?  If you're using the scope excitation at 514 (bright green) then your
rhodamine may give a good signal by microscopy, yet not fluoresce well (or at all)
excited with the 488 nm line from your laser.  If you can tune your laser to 514 nm,
try that.  If you have a fixed output laser (most analyzers do), then you need a
different dye.
MAK.


--
Mark A. KuKuruga, Managing Director
University of Michigan Flow Core
7416 CCGC 0946
(734) 647-3216, fax (734) 936-7376
kukuru@umich.edu


>>> Muhammad Anzar <manzar@uoguelph.ca> 03/28/01 02:25PM >>>

Hello Friends:

We are working on the uptake of a rhodamine-labeled protein by
spermatozoa. Under fluorescent microscope, there is clear fluorescence
on sperm head but but it can not be detected by flow cytometer (argon
ion laser of 488 nm) using FL3 (wavelength 580). Two different flow
cytometers have been tried but the results are same. Your suggestions in
solving this problem would be highly appreciated.

Muhammad Anzar DVM, PhD
Department of Animal and Poultry Science
University of Guelph
Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1
Phone: 519-824-4120 (x3689 Off; x8355 Lab)
Fax: 519-836-98733
--
ÐÏࡱá



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 05 2003 - 19:01:13 EST