Re: An image analysis question

From: Ray Hicks (RayH@FCSPress.com)
Date: Wed Jun 07 2000 - 16:03:26 EST


Hi Maris,

It could well be that you're seeing an aliased version of
mains-frequency modulation (ripple)  of your light source. The ripple
causes partial strobing in the light source which is noticable at
high shutter speeds. Try acquiring a continuous high speed movie, at
greater than 120Hz if you can (you might be able to go that fast if
you only sample a partial image - depending on your set up and
IPLab's capabilities).

If you sample at just greater than 120Hz, you'll get a regular
fluctuation that repeats every four frames, if you sample at lower
than that (Nyquist) frequency, you'll get low frequency "beats". At
video(=mains) rate, the picture may be steady as a rock depending on
synchronisation.  Also depending on synchronisation between your time
lapse system and mains frequency, the fluctuation period in your
played-back movies might be "random", since the phases might be
drifting with respect to each other.

If it does behave as above, there's a cheap cure:

Use a longer exposure if available, or acquire a running-average
image if available, or acquire a burst of video-rate frames at each
time point and average them later.  These methods allow you to smooth
the ripple out over time (like your eyes do - I presume that every
thing looks alright through the eyepiece) you'll have to experiment
with these methods to find an acceptable level of smoothing.

and an expensive preventative:

If you're using an incandescent light source, buy a regulated DC
supply (to replace the rheostat that's probably used in your system)
which will remove the mains ripple before it hits the bulb.

Ray


. At 4:51 pm +0000 6/6/00, Maris Handley wrote:
>Hello Everyone,
>
>We are doing time lapse experiments with a Nikon microscope (using
>IPLab software).
>When we play the movie back we are seeing large changes in light
>intensity (almost
>random...not getting brighter continuously or dimmer continuously).
>Our exposure time
>isn't being changed.  I believe this is a problem with the light
>source stability,
>but is there something else that might be causing this?  Has anyone
>else seen this,
>and what did you do to solve the problem?
>
>Thank you for any help,
>Maris
>
>
>Maris Handley
>Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
>Boston, MA 02115
>(617)632-3179

--
                               Ray Hicks
________________________________________________________________________
|University of Cambridge          |Tel              01223 330149        |
|Department of Medicine           |Fax             01223 336846         |
|Level 5, Addenbrookes Hospital   |e-mail         <rh208@cus.cam.ac.uk> |
|Hills Road Cambridge             |Web  http://facsmac.med.cam.ac.uk    |
|CB2                              |ftp server  ftp://131.111.80.78      |
|UK                               |                                     |
|_________________________________|_____________________________________|



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 10 2001 - 19:31:22 EST