Re: Vantage vs. STAR on size discrimination

From: Bernhard Peball (bernhard.peball@igeneon.com)
Date: Wed Mar 29 2000 - 08:19:18 EST


Dear Mark!
Maybe you should simply take your smart user aside and ask him to explain his statement.
What exactly does he or she mean by 'inferior'?

I'm fed up with smart users who come along telling you that this is better than that.
If you ask them why they are so convinced, you sometimes hear the most funny
explanations.

Sorry for being so cynical, but I quit smoking five days ago. Your user better not
come over to my lab :-)

cheers,
brn

On Fri, 24 Mar 2000 14:53:27 -0500, Mark Shlomchik wrote:

>
>To all:
>
>I have a user who claims that the FACSVantage is inferior to the
>FACSTAR in discriminating size of cells by FSC.  I would a priori see
>no reason why this should be true. Am I missing something? Have
>others seen this?
>
>
>Mark Shlomchik, MD, PhD
>Associate Professor of Laboratory Medicine
>and Immunobiology
>Yale University School of Medicine
>
>203-688-2089
>203-688-2748 (fax)
>mark.shlomchik@yale.edu
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 10 2001 - 19:31:13 EST