well I've worked with both and didn't see any difference: both had the same optical components. Maybe he was using different laser power or something. However, there appears to be a difference in FSC resolution between the BD sorters and the FACSCAN. The Scan being better. Ann At 14:53 24.03.00 -0500, you wrote: > >To all: > >I have a user who claims that the FACSVantage is inferior to the >FACSTAR in discriminating size of cells by FSC. I would a priori see >no reason why this should be true. Am I missing something? Have >others seen this? > > >Mark Shlomchik, MD, PhD >Associate Professor of Laboratory Medicine >and Immunobiology >Yale University School of Medicine > >203-688-2089 >203-688-2748 (fax) >mark.shlomchik@yale.edu > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 10 2001 - 19:31:13 EST