Re: A DNA analysis question -additional

From: Ron (rondudek@miltenyibiotec.com)
Date: Wed Dec 22 1999 - 18:38:53 EST


Hi Howard et al,

It was Ronald Reagan who attempted to champion the benefits of a 
small, narrow beam laser, I believe.

The mighty Bryte did give quite excellent peak cv's, especially when 
using a mercury lamp and giving the PI a nice shot of some 550 
excitation, but there weren't enough folks that wanted to buy an arc 
lamp machine for DNA analysis only, and the trade-off you got with 
FITC excitation, plus the cover slip change and periodic need for 
manual alignment... .

Regards,
Ron


>Nick Terry writes:
>
>>IMHO adequate DNA measurements can only be made if the
>>cross section of your interogating beam is substantially narrower than the
>>diameter of the objects that you are measuring.
>>
>>(Waiting for flames.)
>>
>>Under these conditions 2 G1 cells stuck together will have a very similar
>>integral (yes - mostly the same as area) signal as a true single G2/M cell.
>>The peak signal from a G2/M cell will however be significantly greater than
>>that from a G1 cell and from the sequential peak signals from a G1G1
>>doublet. But, the latter is only visible if the exciting beam is narrow.
>>In comparisons between area/width and integral (area)/peak discriminating
>>ability on an instrument with 5 micron excitation optics the integral peak
>>analysis gave the best discrimination. It is even possible to recognize
>>doublets that are not progressing linearly through the beam due to
>>turbulence or other factors.
>>
>>How anyone manages to discriminate doublets from true G2 cells with a 40
>>micron beam, or nuclei with a 15-20 micron beam is beyond me. (tactfully).
>>
>>(Pondering the likelihood that there is a greater proportion of tetraploid
>>tumors in the literature than in reality.)
>
>Yes, one does need a narrow beam for doublet discrimination, but the 
>most precise DNA measurements are made with arc source systems, 
>notably the Partec, but also Lindmo and Steen's (Skatron, Bruker, 
>Bio-Rad, etc.) design, where the beam is substantially larger than 
>the cells, and the nondirectional illumination is important in 
>getting the precision...
>
>Only a warmish breeze; not a flame, I hope.
>
>-Howard

Ronald P. Dudek
Clinical Products Business Manager
Miltenyi Biotec, Inc.
251 Auburn Ravine Rd.
Suite 208
Auburn, CA 95603

Phone (800) 367-6227
Fax (530) 888-8925



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 03 2002 - 11:54:22 EST