Re: 4 colours on FACS Calibur

From: Matthias Haury (mhaury@igc.gulbenkian.pt)
Date: Sat Nov 27 1999 - 05:34:55 EST


Hi Katja,

this is almost certainly due to bad alignement of the red laser in the
FACSCalibur. You have to make sure that the dichroics are well aligned and
then adjust the timing between the two lasers very delicately (adjust the
red laser height adjustment). In general doing this with the Calibrite
Beads does often not result in correct alignment because the PerCP beads do
not exhibit the same compensation characteristics as do tandem conjugates.

It is therefore better to adjust your laser while running real 4 color
samples through the machine, and adjust the laser + dicroics until you get
optimal compensation (going back and forth between the cells and APC beads
to adjust the time delay after you touch the laser). You should never have
to go much over 50% compensation of FL4-FL3 with PE-CY5 conjugates (even
with bad conjugates). Of cours there is a variability in the batches of
tandem conjugates due to different conjugation efficiencies, but in most
cases I have seen the problems are due to bad timing adjustments.

If you do not know how to do this yourself (I agree it's a bit tricky and
time consuming), ask the technician to get the job done until your cells
look good. Don't let them get away with just showing you on beads that the
things work..;)

Hope that helps.

Matthias

_____________________________________
Prof. Dr. Matthias Haury
Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciencia
Unidade de Imagiologia Celular
Rua Da Quinta Grande N° 6 - Apt.14
P-2781 Oeiras Codex
Portugal
Email: mhaury@igc.gulbenkian.pt
Tel: + 351 21 440 79 85 Office
Tel: + 351 21 440 79 10 Secretary
Fax: + 351 21 440 79 70
_____________________________________


At 13:35 +0100 26/11/1999, Katja Adolf wrote:
>    Dear flowers,   We are currently using a 4 colour panel with FITC,
>PE, RPE-Cy5 and APC on a FACS Calibur and have to compensate as much as
>86%  FL4-FL3 to get reasonable populations. This worked until a new
>antibody batch  and combination differed too much in flourescense. Also we
>are not happy with  this high compensation. Markers of interest are FITC
>and PE labeled, but we  would like to use the FL3 and FL4 for more than
>just gating  purposes. Looking in the archive there is only an unanswered
>post from 1995, claiming that it probably is impossible NOT to use PerCP
>but   tandem conjugates instead.   Any others using this setup? Any
>advices? Thanks in  advance.   With best regards, Katja  
>**************************************************
>Katja Adolf, PhD  student                                                  
>Aarhus University  Hospital                                                
>Allergy and Lung Research
>Clinic                                                          
>Nørrebrogade 44, DK-8000 Aarhus C,  Denmark               
>Phone  +45/ 8949 2106  Fax +45/ 8949  2110                         
>email: kad@mailme.dk                                                    
>**************************************************



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 03 2002 - 11:54:16 EST