Re: attachments to msgs.

From: adrian rubio (genius@nmt.edu)
Date: Wed Jul 21 1999 - 15:54:54 EST


Well said!
-Adrian

On Mon, 19 Jul 1999, Don Walker wrote:

> 
> Greetings,
> 
> 
> My  $.02  worth on this issue. I like attachments.  A picture is worth
> a lot of words.I personally feel that 3,4,5 paragraph monologues get
> dreary. I looked at all three of the attachments in questions in less than
> a minute.  I feel if someone is lesuirely scrolling through their list
> mailings at home( adult beverage in hand?) with limited bandwidth they
> should be a little patient or have the wisdom to not access mailings
> with attachments until they are in front of a proper workstation.
> We all have pain.  Its a relative experience. I hope that we don't spook
> honest inquiries off this list by testy responses.  I personally think
> the original sender should not feel bad about anything, the apology was
> not necessary, and he should becomplemented  on the energy and time spent
> to make his inquiry as clear as possible.  These kind of graphics don't
> pop up much and we ought to cut people a little slack.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> DW
> 
>               Don Walker
> 
>               Chiroscience R&D Inc.
> 
> <paraindent><param>left</param>     1631 220th St. SE.
> 
>      Bothell,WA 98021
> 
>      Fax:425.489.8019
> 
> 	  Voice:425.489.8110</paraindent>
> 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 03 2002 - 11:53:47 EST