Re: Sensitivity to room light.

From: Joseph Webster (J.Webster@centenary.usyd.edu.AU)
Date: Wed Jan 27 1999 - 17:49:37 EST


At 15:57 26/01/99 -0500, Keith Bahjat wrote:
 (In response to Joan's question about PI fading)
>This message brings up a point that I'd like to see addressed by the experts.

Remember the definition:
"X" is the unknown quantity, and "spurt" is a drip under pressure.
;~)

I am not claiming expert status, but I do have some observations from the
operator's vantage point...

We often see PerCP fade significantly over an hour or two in room light,
the change was enough to ruin an experiment.

I have seen tandem conjugates separate into mixtures of tandem plus
separate fluorochromes.
This separation was variable from tube to tube, and made compensation
unworkable!

I can't comment on the behaviour of PI in this context, though I don't
remember such effects when I was reading lots of DNA samples years ago.
 
I've not seen significant fading of FITC or PE, but I haven't looked
very hard; I've always presumed they are less prone to fading.

There are many variables in this can of worms, most of which I have no
idea of.
Most people here take the relatively easy precautions like keeping
things covered (most of the time) and on ice unless room temperature
(or higher) is specified.

	Joseph.

>In my hands, FITC (as well as PE, PerCP, APC, PI, 7-AAD, and ToPro-3) is very
>stable, and no precautions need to be taken while staining or running
samples,
>as no degradation has ever been seen.
>Every clinical and research lab I've been
>in stains samples on the bench top and takes no special precautions to avoid
>any forms of light. But some researchers here do things like staining in the
>dark, encasing samples in aluminum foil, and using red filters on the room
>lights in the flow lab for fear of fluorochrome degradation. Based on my
>experience, I'm not sure why they fear the light to this extent. I've seen
this
>happen using the fluorescent scope, but I think those are usually fluors like
>Cy2 and Cy3. Are some derivations of fluorescein more photolabile than
others,
>or am I ruining my samples.
>
>thanks for any news and views.
>
>Keith Bahjat
>kbahjat@ufl.edu

--
Joseph Webster
Flow Cytometry Facility
Centenary Institute



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 03 2002 - 11:53:00 EST