Dear Vadim, Thank you for bringing to our attention the excellent web page concerning linear to log conversion. You asked >And, finally, could anybody explain me what the following paragraph >means? >"This assumes that the log amplification is perfect (i.e., each of >the four decades is accurate) which we know is likely a fiction. The >first and last decades can be very inaccurate"? For an explanation of errors in log to linear conversion etc please see the following reference: Schmid I, Schmid P, Giorgi JV (1988) Cytometry 9: 533-538 Best wishes Nigel Blackhall University of Nottingham
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 03 2002 - 11:50:16 EST