Re: CyChrome & PerCP
Tom Mc Closkey (thomasm@nshs.edu)
Fri, 6 Sep 96 16:30:48 PDT
On Wed, 4 Sep 1996 15:54:36 -0400 (EDT) Paul J. Jansen wrote:
>
>Well, we have used both CyChrome and PcP, and we like PcP. CyChrome was
>very bright and made compensation a nightmare, whereas PcP was dimmer,
>yet this resulted in much easier compensation. BD FACscan one laser is
>the machine we use.
I'm curious which marker combinations made compensation so difficult with
cychrome and in which direction was the problem? How different were the
compensation settings with perCP?
-------------------------------------
Name: Tom Mc Closkey
E-mail: thomasm@nshs.edu
Date: 09/06/96
Time: 16:30:48
This message was sent by Chameleon
-------------------------------------
Thomas W. Mc Closkey, Ph. D.
Director, Flow Cytometry
North Shore University Hospital
Cornell University Medical College
Manhasset, Long Island, New York
ph: 516-562-4641 fax: 516-562-2866
e-mail: thomasm@nshs.edu
CD ROM Vol 2 was produced by staff at the Purdue University Cytometry Laboratories
and distributed free of charge as an educational service to the cytometry community.
If you have any comments please direct them to Dr. J. Paul Robinson, Professor & Director, PUCL,
Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907. Phone:(317) 494-0757; FAX (317) 494-0517; Web http://www.cyto.purdue.edu
EMAIL robinson@flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu
