FACS Flow and live sorts

Dave Coder (dave@nucleus.immunol.washington.edu)
Wed, 15 Nov 95 11:57:03 -0800

A few months ago we switched to FACS Flow (produced by Streck Labs and
distributed by BD) as sheath fluid because it was cheaper.

In general the new sheath works great for sorters and analyzers. We've found,
however, that after sorting cells that should attach (e.g., various
fibroblast lines) did not. Other cells (say, thymic cells that grow in
suspension culture) seem unaffected.

That something in the FACS Flow was affecting the cells was tested by taking
a cell sample, subdividing into aliquots, spinning down and resuspending in
FACS Flow, PBS, and HBSS; incubating for a period at 4C, spinning down again,
and replating. Only the cells that spent time in FACS Flow would not attach;
others attached, flattened out, and began to grow.

Previously we had used Hemaline (Serono Labs) with no ill effects. Hemaline
contains lithium chloride and some "preservative", but FACS Flow uses sodium
fluoride and some "antibacterial".

Has anyone else had similar observations, and does anyone know if any of the
additives affect cellular attachment and/or growth?

Dave Coder
dcoder@u.washington.edu


Home Page Table of Contents Sponsors Web Sites
CD ROM Vol 2 was produced by staff at the Purdue University Cytometry Laboratories and distributed free of charge as an educational service to the cytometry community. If you have any comments please direct them to Dr. J. Paul Robinson, Professor & Director, PUCL, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907. Phone:(317) 494-0757; FAX (317) 494-0517; Web http://www.cyto.purdue.edu EMAIL robinson@flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu