GFP vs FDG

Mario Roederer (ROEDERER@Darwin.Stanford.EDU)
Tue, 12 Sep 1995 08:59:22 -0700 (PDT)

We have been pursuing the GFP as a reporter gene, and can compare it to
our extensive experience with lacZ/FDG.

There is no way that the GFP will EVER be as sensitive as lacZ/FDG. We
were able to run the FACS-Gal assay down to 5 molecules of lacZ per
cell (!). Typically, at least 20-30 are needed for minimal detection
in most cell lines; by the time you get to 100 per cell, you have a
reasonably bright system!

100 GFP's are unlikely to be detectable in a single cell.

That said, GFP is, however, quite useful. Especially the more recently
published mutants which are considerably "brighter"... with a
reasonable strong promoter, expression can be easily detected with
positively-expressing cells 1-2 orders of magnitude above autofluorescence.

Dr. Darley is correct: the catalytic activity of lacZ, which allows
single enzyme molecules to generate thousands of fluors, gives that
system an amplification advantage for sensitivity that will not be
overcome by GFP.

mr


Home Page Table of Contents Sponsors Web Sites
CD ROM Vol 2 was produced by staff at the Purdue University Cytometry Laboratories and distributed free of charge as an educational service to the cytometry community. If you have any comments please direct them to Dr. J. Paul Robinson, Professor & Director, PUCL, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907. Phone:(317) 494-0757; FAX (317) 494-0517; Web http://www.cyto.purdue.edu EMAIL robinson@flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu