RFIT/SOBR Models
Pawel Majcher (mmmajche@cyf-kr.edu.pl)
Wed, 5 Jul 1995 23:22:42 +0200
Hello,
my friend who has no access to the Internet asked me to mail her question to
the cytometry list. The message starts here:
"We have been using FACScan equipped with DDM and CellFit software for 5
years. What kind of model (and why) is the best for DNA analysis in solid
tumors and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma? Many researchers prefer a RFIT model. Our
experience indicate that more objective and closer to reality is SOBR.
S-phase fraction established by RFIT is often higher (especially for high
early S-phase) than should be.
We'll be very grateful for explanation this problem and pointing some
references.
Bozena Lackowska
Oncology Institute
Cracow, Poland
CD ROM Vol 2 was produced by staff at the Purdue University Cytometry Laboratories
and distributed free of charge as an educational service to the cytometry community.
If you have any comments please direct them to Dr. J. Paul Robinson, Professor & Director, PUCL,
Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907. Phone:(317) 494-0757; FAX (317) 494-0517; Web http://www.cyto.purdue.edu
EMAIL robinson@flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu
