RE: PerCP (& compensation)

Mario Roederer (Roederer@Darwin.Stanford.EDU)
Thu, 09 May 1996 21:00:34 -0800

> In the past we have used cychrome (??spell??) as a >
"third" color on our one laser Facscan. The problem we > had
with it was difficult to compensate between FL1 and > FL3. We are
considering using PerCP now and I would > like to know if anyone has
experience with it.

The use of PerCP does not necessarily change the need for FL1-FL3
compensation. The need for this compensation arises from the spectrum
of FITC, not CyChrome--no need to switch from CyChrome to the less
bright PerCP!

The fact is, "we" have been ignoring the need to do FL1 to FL3
compensation all these years, because we are lucky--by properly
compensating PE into FL3, and FITC into FL2, you are usually taking
care of the FITC into FL3 compensation need. This is explained in
detail in one of my Web pages on compensation: see the page
http://cmgm.stanford.edu/~roederer/compensation/3colorComp.html

If you have problems with FITC spilling into the third channel, your
only real option is to try different filters on the third channel until
the problem goes away. The redder a filter you can use, the better; we
use a 682/33 for the Cy5PE emission, together with a 585/15 for PE and
a 530/30 for FITC; this combination does not need significant
FITC-Cy5PE compensation.

> BD has promised to throw in calibrite beads capable of doing >
the three color compensation. Comments?

Well... BD wants to sell you PerCP reagents.

mr


Home Page Table of Contents Sponsors Web Sites
CD ROM Vol 2 was produced by staff at the Purdue University Cytometry Laboratories and distributed free of charge as an educational service to the cytometry community. If you have any comments please direct them to Dr. J. Paul Robinson, Professor & Director, PUCL, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907. Phone:(317) 494-0757; FAX (317) 494-0517; Web http://www.cyto.purdue.edu EMAIL robinson@flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu