Fluorescence sensitivity FACScan vs. FACS Vantage SE

From: Eckstein, Volker (Volker.Eckstein@med.uni-heidelberg.de)
Date: Mon Nov 18 2002 - 11:43:17 EST


Hi collegues,

is there anyone who can tell me something about the differences of
fluorescence sensitivity on the FACScan and the FACS Vantage SE?

I had a badly labelled sample of white blood cells labelled with
CD4-CyChrome (PECy5). On the Vantage equipped with a 100um nozzle it was
impossible to detect any fluorescence on FL3-channel with a 675/20 BP-filter
at 100mW argon laser light. After relabelling a small aliquot of the cells
with the same antibody (10ul antibody on 4x10exp6 cells) I could detect a
dim fluorescence. Not even a log between the negatives and the positives but
good enough for a calculation. I have used antibodies with CyChrome several
times before with other cells and never have seen such a bad fluorescence.
All the optics were well aligned. But as I said I think the amount of
antibody (100ul antibody solution in a 5ml volume of PBS with 2%FCS for
2x10exp8 white blood cells) is not sufficient for proper sorting.

Interestingly the CD4-CyChrome bad labelled cells could easily be seen on
the Fl3-channel on our old old FACScan. Even with this little amount of
antibody there was a clear and beautiful difference between CD4pos.  and
neg. cells. The relabelled aliquot of cells  didn't give any improved signal
on the FACScan.

Any suggestions?

Thanks in advance

Best regards    Volker

Volker Eckstein PhD
Dept. of Internal Medicine V
Medical school of the university
University of Heidelberg
GERMANY
volker_eckstein@med.uni-heidelberg.de



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 05 2003 - 19:26:30 EST