RE:gfp sorting

From: Pizzo,Eugene (Pizzo@nso1.uchc.edu)
Date: Fri Oct 18 2002 - 07:04:14 EST


Andy,

We've been sorting transfected GFP osteoblasts for several years now and
had exactly the same problem you describe. Initially we had less fanning on
our FACStar Plus than on our FACSVantage SE so we assumed the problem
was due to the increased "sensitivity" of the longer deflection plates since
we
were also using identical pressure and drop drive on both machines but our
service engineer
noticed a lot of downstream signaling in the forward scatter indicating that
the cells were a lot larger than we thought and a lot more varied in size.

He suggested actually going to a higher pressure and ddf
than we were used to employing with our 100um nozzle,
specifically we settled on 12 psi with a ddf of 20.7 and an
amplitude of 5.2 volts on our DIVA which usually accudrops
to 16 - 17, similar settings in analog.

We also filter the cells three times through the
Falcon blue-capped strainer tubes, 35um mesh
and this seems to have helped.

I should mention we still get some fanning but it is
considerably less. I think the combination of going
to a larger nozzle, playing with your pressure and ddf
settings and triple filtering the cells is the answer.

Gene Pizzo
Manager FACS Facility, UCONN Health



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 05 2003 - 19:26:27 EST