CFSE labeling for in-vivo vs. in-vitro experiments?

From: PAUL HALLBERG (Paul.Hallberg@mail.tju.edu)
Date: Thu Sep 12 2002 - 13:26:53 EST


I would appreciate any helpful information regarding CFSE labeling for
in-vivo vs. in-vitro experiments. Below my client describes his results:

In the in vivo experiments, I inject (intravenously) CFSE-labeled CD4+ T
cells from C57B/6 mouse into bm12 mouse (allogenic setting). When I pull out
the splenocytes and lymph nodes from the bm12 mouse and run flow analysis,
the CFSE proliferation was not observed 48 h post-stimulation, but from 72 h
onwards, CFSE proliferation was consistant (7 rounds of proliferation;
undivided cells about 30%; precursor frequency about 14%). When I tried to
repeat the same experiment in vitro, I see a prominant bunch of cells that
are low on CFSE scale (corresponding to 4-5 rounds of division) in addition
to the undivided (CFSE high) peak within 48 h. I do not see any ordered CFSE
proliferation in vitro further on (after 48 h). My CFSE + mimosin and CFSE +
ConA controls are very fine.  We wonder whether synchronious stimulation in
vitro is the reason for this observation, or whether I am missing something
somewhere.

Thanks in advance!

Paul L. Hallberg
Flow Cytometry Manager
KCC CORE Flow Cytometry Facility
Thomas Jefferson University
215-503-4556
215-923-0249(fax)
Paul.Hallberg@mail.tju.edu



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 05 2003 - 19:26:25 EST