RE: missing CD69

From: Calman Prussin (CPRUSSIN@niaid.nih.gov)
Date: Tue Sep 03 2002 - 17:19:47 EST


The BD clone works fine in our hands when used at the same time as the
anti-cytokine mAbs and as a PE or APC conjugate. The CD69 is intracellular,
due to the use of brefeldin A; therefore if using BFA you must stain after
permeabilization. Given that TNF and IFN-g are pretty bright, you should
have no problem getting a free channel for use of CD69 PE or APC.

>From your email I'm not sure if you have tried looking at intracellular CD69
in PMA/ionomycin activated, fixed and permeabilized cells. Would start with
that as a positive control. Also, how long are you activating your cells
for? 6 hours is enough to see CD69.  

Calman

> _______________________
> Calman Prussin
> Laboratory of Allergic Diseases
> NIAID/ National Institutes of Health
> ----------
> From:		Michal Abel
> Sent:		Monday, September 2, 2002 17:39
> To:	Cytometry Mailing List
> Subject:	missing CD69
> 
> 
> Dear experts in flow cytometry,
> 
> I am performing an intracellular staining of lymphocytes for INF and TNF.
> These
> markers work very well after PMA or peptide stimulation. My problem is
> that all
> INF or TNF positives cells are CD69 neg.
> I have tried CD69 from Immutech and from BD. Both works well on non-fixed
> cells. Unfortunately, I cannot visualize CD69+ after fixation. I have try
> to
> fix with perm&fix kit (Caltag), BD fixation sol. and classical
> saponine/formaldehyde method. I have also tried to stain with CD69 before
> and
> after fixation. I have always had all CD69 at 101log (same for PMA
> and peptide activation and non activated control cells).
> Can someone tell me what I am doing wrong, please ?
> 
> Thank you for all your help and any ideas !
> 
> Michal
> 
> --
> Michal Abel, MD, PhD
> Laboratory of Clinical Immunology
> INSERM U25
> Necker Hospital, 161 Rue de Sèvres. Paris
> tel: 33 1 42 19 28 87
> fax: 33 1 44 49 53 74
> 
> 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 05 2003 - 19:26:20 EST