RE: Sample differential

From: Mucheru, Peter (P.MUCHERU@CGIAR.ORG)
Date: Tue Apr 16 2002 - 00:37:56 EST


James,

Ensure you have the correct drop delays and ensure you're making good
deflection so that your deflected streams in air will contain the cells of
your interest. This might improve your sorting purities. I have worked with
BD  Facstarplus for fifteen years and in most cases I have reanalysed sorted
populations to purities of 99%.

Wish you luck.

Peter Mucheru.

-----Original Message-----
From: James Marvin [mailto:jmarvin@flowcity.bsd.uchicago.edu]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 8:57 PM
To: cyto-inbox
Subject: Sample differential



Good day,

	Within the last couple of weeks we have been having purity issues
with a
MoFlo.	When we reanalyze some of the samples we get a mixture of
cells.	When this happen we recheck the drop delay and it is exactly where
it should be.  I am stumped on what the problem could be other than
electronic problems.  In my attempt to rule out one by one all of the
foreseeable problems, one thing that popped into my mind was that we often
have people come in and have no clue, or, are way off on what they think
there sample concentration is.	So often times I run the samples with a
high differential.  Sometimes as high as 1 psi above sheath pressure.  I'm
pretty new to flow cytometry but believe that the wider the sample core
(high differential) the less hydrodynamic focusing takes place and
therefore the cells will not be perfectly aligned.  So basically we are not
getting a true picture of what the fluorescence is of a particular
cell.  So then when we reanalyze the cells at a lower differential the
cells have a different, more accurate fluorescent pattern.  So my question
is.  Is this a legitimate concern?  Are you strict with clients to have
their samples at an optimal concentration in order to keep differential
low?   Any other suggestion on what the cause of impure sorting can be?  I
know that last one is an endless black hole but I thought I'd try it out
anyway.  I will mention that in one particular case there was no
compensation needed,  instrument setup was optimized just like every other
day, staining in controls and sample looked great, and drop delay was
right-on.



Thanx
a ton

marv



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 05 2003 - 19:26:07 EST