Just kidding. But you all opened this mail with excitement. Right? Why are the cytometers not automated? Why is the 96 well plate not the default sample carrier? Most of us stain cell for flow cytometry analysis on 96 well plates. For over a decade we had to transfer them into tubes, sit in front of an instrument and exchange them one by one for hours. OK...I am somewhat emotional today after running close to 600 tubes by hand. My back hurts, my eyes are tired from the screen and my left shoulder suffered repetitive motion injury. Us who run core labs especially in industrial settings have to screen large volumes of samples on a regular basis. The request for 96 well sampler was out there for a very long time. Years. No response from the manufacturers. Recently BD introduced an addition to the FACS Calibur that can take up cells from the 96 well format. It is not a great help for those of us who need to run hundreds a day. Also too expensive and meant for the hobbyists. CyTek's MAS is a faster device with limited acquisition control and no field service. Cytomation's MosKeeto is only good for simple yes-or-no type screening on a time scale on the MoFlo. CyAn does not even have a plate sampler addition (maybe next year??? - we heard that before). Why don't we unite and give an ultimatum to the manufacturers. YOU EITHER MAKE FAST, ROBUST 96 WELL PLATE SAMPLERS OR ELSE .......... we keep using tubes just like we do now. This is our last, desperate resort. Flow cytometers are in the forefront of academic and industrial research as well as manufacturing. The technology (including the software!) is not following the trend. I go back and finish the two hundred remaining samples..... (The numbers are a result of theatrical dramatization - run 800 samples on a Calibur in a day and your left arm will be paralyzed. You better seek mental help at the end of such a day.) Best regards, Akos Biogen
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 05 2003 - 19:01:27 EST