Don't forget to figure in time as a cost. A faster sorter saves time and to many clients this equals a savings in money Dom Fenoglio On Thu, 3 May 2001 ckuszyns@UNMC.EDU wrote: > Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 16:20:14 -0500 > From: ckuszyns@UNMC.EDU > To: Cytometry Mailing List <cytometry@flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu> > Subject: Re: Vantage SE or MoFlo? > > > > Just think about this question. The reality is, that the sorter you choose > is directly related to what your sort needs are. > > > > "geoff morgan > (BI)" To: Cytometry Mailing List > <cytometry@flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu> > <geoff.morgan@bb cc: > src.ac.uk> Subject: Vantage SE or MoFlo? > > 05/03/2001 05:52 > AM > > > > > > > > Is a MoFlo significantly better than a Vantage SE? The question is really > aimed at flowers who have used both in a research environment. Scientists > here are considering the merits of a MoFlow although we already have a > Vantage SE on site.In the end it will come down to whether the gains can be > justified given the cost. > > Geoff Morgan Babraham,Camdridge U.K. > > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 05 2003 - 19:01:17 EST