FACSVantage DIVA specs and performance

From: Larry Arnold (lwarma@med.unc.edu)
Date: Wed May 02 2001 - 09:42:22 EST


I may be in a position to purchase a second sorter and will consider
another MoFlo and the new Vantage with DIVA.  However, I am not yet very
familiar with the DIVA component of the Vantage and wanted to pose some
questions and get feedback from others that may have it or know about it (I
know it is just now being released).

What I saw in Montpilier  last year had 2 computers - a PC running WinNT
4.0 to drive the digital electronics and a G3/G4 running CellQuest to do
everything else.  Is that the way the final system has ended up?  If so
that seems like a lot of overhead.

As I understand it the DIVA system does not have log amps but uses high
resolution (what is being used? - I was told 14bit) ADCs and look up tables
(like the Coulter XL has done for some time) to generate log data.  Given
ADC characteristics the low end noise will probably drop the resolution to,
functionally, about 12bits?.  Will there be quantumization errors at the
low end with this functional level of resolution range? - at the high end?

The way the signals are being taken is seems as though "peak" signals will
be lost but area signals will be available for all parameters.  Is that
correct?  High rate sampling of the peak will be used to generate area
signals.  Are there serious problems with this approach and have they been
solved?

What is the dead time of this system?  It seems likely to be relatively
long so this would necessarily drop the sort rate.

The ADCs that I believe are being used are 10megahertz.  Are such ADCs not
inherently noisy at the current state-of-the-technology?  Also given all
the considerations is this type of log data generation compatible with
truly high speed sorting - i.e. >15K/sec?  It seems unlikely to me.

Is the principal reason for using the digital log values rather than log
amps due to compensation issues or are there real accuracy (more truly
logarithmic) benefits as well that affect things beside the compensation?

I guess the bottom line is does it work and are there real gains that
justify what likely seems a loss in sort speed and an increase in
operational overhead?

Thanks for joining the discussion.

Larry



Larry W. Arnold, Ph.D.
Res. Assoc. Prof.
Director, Flow Cytometry Facility
Department of Microbiology and Immunology
Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
CB# 7290
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, NC 27599
Phone: 919-966-1530
FAX: 919-962-8103



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 05 2003 - 19:01:17 EST