Re: Additional flurochromes on the LSR

From: Howard T Petrie (h-petrie@ski.mskcc.org)
Date: Wed Dec 20 2000 - 17:33:27 EST


We've had our LSR for a year now, UV/blue at first, then red the last
6 months.  We already published one paper using it (J Immunol. 2000
165:3094-8) for DNA content (DAPI) with three surface antibody stains
(FITC, PE, PerCP).  The DNA CVs found there should say a lot.
Basically, I would say it's absolutely the best cytometer I've ever
used, hands down.  Of course, it won't sort cells.  But it does make
the Calibur look (in my opinion) like a toy, due to much better
fluidics and a reliable hardware/software interface.  The only real
problems with the instrument at this point (hopefully these will
someday evaporate) is that the parameter/fluorescence descriptions do
not match up (apparently nobody at B-D thinks it's important enough
to call FL6 FL6 instead of calling it SSC-width; no real problem if
you're experienced, but try lumping that on top of 7-8 parameter
analysis for a novice, and you have a very good recipe for disaster).
There is also a small problem with FL3 fluorescence getting into FL6
(or is it SSC-W?), but we are working (together with B-D) on a fix.
Bottom line; if you have the money, buy one.

I should mention that we have absolutely no financial affiliation with B-D.
--


Howard T. Petrie, Ph.D.
Head, Laboratory of Developmental Immunology
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
Box 341, 1275 York Avenue
New York, NY 10021
phone (212)639-2149
fax (212)794-4019



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 10 2001 - 19:31:41 EST