Re: Turbo Sort Recovery

From: Simon Monard (smonard@trudeauinstitute.org)
Date: Thu Aug 31 2000 - 08:32:00 EST


Hi

I run a Vantage SE with turbosort and find that the numbers of cells in the tubes
matches quite closely the numbers on the counters. I run everything pretty much as you
do. I understand that the counters on the SE do not include aborts whereas the regular
Vantage will count suitable but aborted cells as sorted. I had a similar experience as
you with our FACStar Plus. Maybe you could get the counters on your instrument upgraded.



Simon Monard
FACS Lab Manager
Trudeau Institute
Saranac Lake
NY12983

Ph 518 891 3080 X352


>>> "Matt Wikstrom" <mattew@cyllene.uwa.edu.au> - 8/30/2000 2:47 AM >>>
This one's for all you Turbo Sorters out there

I have a BD Vantage with Turbo Sort and have found that sort recovery (ie the number
of cells that end up in the tube vs the number on the sort counter) can be very poor.

I routinely sort at 34psi and 60kHz ddf and the recovery seems to decrease as I
increase the sample rate eg 60% recovery at 5000 events/sec and 35% recovery at
10000 events/sec.  Of course, the recovery varies somewhat according to the type
of cells and the frequency of the target cells, but the trend seems to be the same.
The purity is always good though, around 95%, regardless of the recovery.  How does
this compare with the experience of others?

I always use a drop delay profile to set the drop delay (routinely between 29 and 30
drops) when setting up and monitor the side streams and breakoff throughout the sort.
I haven't compared the recoveries for the different sort modes or played around with
drop envelopes: most sorts are done using 1.3 drops in Normal-R mode.

As far as aborts go, I adjust the sample concentration and the dead time to minimise
them.  At sample rates below 6000events/sec, the aborts are always less than 1/10;
above that, they creep up to 1/9 or 1/8.  I never exceed 10,000 events/sec (sample +
abort) when sorting.

I've fiddled with the phase gating switch on card#6 and changing it from the middle
position to the up position doesn't seem to do much to the recovery, although I have
yet to test this on the same day, and have left it in the up position.

I guess what I'm trying to determine is whether my instrument is behaving according
to spec or not.  Any hints, tips, suggestions, voodoo, superstitions you have that
might help improve my recovery would be appreciated immensely.

Also, I'd like to hear about any experiences you've had with the SE digital upgrade
for the Vantage.

Thanks

Matt Wikstrom
Lotteries Flow Cytometry Unit
University of Western Australia
email: mattew@cyllene.uwa.edu.au



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 10 2001 - 19:31:30 EST