viability/high-speed sorting

From: Kathleen Schell (kschell@facstaff.wisc.edu)
Date: Thu Mar 09 2000 - 09:17:42 EST


Greetings to all,
     I initially posted a response privately to this question, but I would
like to ask a general question of those much more knowledgeable than I.
Until recently I had assumed that pressure, sheath fluid, and collection
medium were the main causes of cell death after sorting.  However, recently
we had a problem with stray voltage on a FACStarPlus (shocks after just
touching the cytometer, plates charging by themselves, etc.) that was
coincident with lousy viability after sorting.  In frustration, I performed
the following: 1) I collected the waste stream (pressure, no light, no
electrical field)--cells were 97% viable, 2) I collected the waste stream
(pressure, laser engaged, plates on)--cells were 96% viable. 3) I sorted
cells--10% viable!  (All of these tasks were performed in less than a 5
minute period).  We had zapped the cells.  Is it possible that the
electrical charge behaves somewhat like electroporation which is really
hard on cells?  The manufacturer was stumped, but a retooling of the
instrument solved the problem.  I have never seen a discussion on this
aspect of sorting, but could this also contribute to loss of viability and
function?  If so, can we adjust this?
Thanks,
Kathy

--------------------------------------------------------------
Kathy Schell
Supervisor, UWCCC Flow Cytometry Facility
600 Highland Ave.  K4/535
Madison, WI 53792
Voice:  608-263-0313
e-mail:  kschell@facstaff.wisc.edu



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 10 2001 - 19:31:11 EST