Re: Hoechst and microbiology

From: Howard Shapiro (hms@shapirolab.com)
Date: Thu Feb 17 2000 - 19:22:40 EST


Sue DeMaggio asks:


>Has anyone used Hoechst to stain bacteria?  or have a procedure for it?  I 
>have a client asking.

Live or fixed?  Hoechst will get into some live bacteria; so will DAPI; 
both will stain a broader range of bacteria after ethanol fixation.  Many 
years ago, the Livermore group used staining with Hoechst 33258 and 
chromomycin A3 to discriminate bacterial species on the basis of the 
A-T/G-C ratio in DNA (Van Dilla MA, Langlois RG, Pinkel D et al: Bacterial 
characterization by flow cytometry.  Science 220:620, 1983).  However, a 
recent paper (Walberg M, Gaustad P, Steen HB: Uptake kinetics of nucleic 
acid targeting dyes in S. aureus, E. faecalis, and B. Cereus: a flow 
cytometric study. J Microbiol Methods 1999; 35:167-176) indicates that 
staining of bacteria by Hoechst dyes and most other nucleic acid stains can 
vary considerably from species to species, and may be affected by the 
presence or absence of efflux pumps (in live cells), as well as by the 
fixative or permeabilizing agent used.  With a consistent preparative 
procedure, one ought to be able to compare DNA contents of different cells 
from a single species; comparing species could be trickier.  It is becoming 
increasingly evident that, in terms of their behavior when exposed to the 
fluorescent dyes we know and love, bacteria aren't just little eukaryotes.

-Howard



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 10 2001 - 19:31:08 EST