RE: separose beads in a facscan

From: Witherspoon, Sam (sw11527@glaxowellcome.com)
Date: Wed Feb 16 2000 - 20:14:09 EST


Hi Deb,
	I lived,
		but it wasn't pretty.
	I once tried using Sepharose as a model for solid phase binding
studies, but repeatedly clogged the 'sipper' of a FACSort and was glad when
I finally got the tube cleared.  I cannot remember the swollen size of the
particles, but at the time was assuming (wrong !!) that they were
significantly smaller than the I.D. of the sipper.
	I would recommend that your colleague procure some smaller coated
particles which should be available from places like Spherotech,
(www.spherotech.com), unless he can guarantee that his beads are 30-40
microns or less in diameter.

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Deborah Berglund [SMTP:umbbd@gemini.oscs.montana.edu]
> Sent:	Tuesday, February 15, 2000 3:41 PM
> To:	Cytometry Mailing List
> Subject:	separose beads in a facscan
> 
> 
> 
> Hi everybody,
> 
>   A colleague wants to know if anyone has looked at sepharose beads in a
> FACScan and lived to tell about it.  He wants to bind a fluorescent
> protein to an Ab, then bind the whole works to protein A coated sepharose
> bead, then analyse the relative fluorescence with our FACScan without
> gacking up the tubing, etc.
> 
> Thanks,
> Deb Berglund
> Montana State University
> 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 10 2001 - 19:31:07 EST