Re: Anti-Viral Susceptibility Testing using Flow

From: Mark A. KuKuruga (kukuru@umich.edu)
Date: Wed Feb 16 2000 - 08:54:53 EST


Deneen,
I've not used these cells, but from what I've read you shouldn't have any
problems reading these as any other fibroblast-like cell.  They may be
relatively large, so there may be an advantage to using log FSC/log SSC.  This
will allow you to compress the signal into a better manageable cluster.
Keep in mind that these types of cultures are more likely to clump, and may
grow as clusters that are more tricky to render as single cells.  Viral
infection leading to growth perturbations and expanded cell death will add to
these complications.  Your best ally in developing this assay is the
microscope . . . microscopic viewing can often eliminate some of the mystery
of flow cytometry.

"Kozoriz, Deneen HE0" wrote:

> Hello Fellow Flowers
>
> Our lab has been using the BD FACSCalibur for Leukemia/Lymphoma and CD4/8
> testing.  Our clinical director wants us to expand the Flow Cytometry
> section and develop procedures for anti-viral susceptibility testing.  Our
> first project is anti-viral drugs for HSV using Vero cells.
> We have encountered a few stumbling blocks (i.e.: what do Vero cells look
> like FSC vs SSC???/ should the graphs be Log or Lin etc.).
> Is anyone working in this area?  I would really like to pick your brain.
> Any response would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Thanking you in advance
>
> P.S. Happy Valentine's Day
>
> Deneen E. Kozoriz B.Sc.
> Provincial Laboratories
> Regina, Sask. Canada
>
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>    Part 1.2    Type: application/ms-tnef
>            Encoding: base64

--
Mark A. KuKuruga, Managing Director
University of Michigan Core Flow Cytometry
<http://www.cancer.med.umich.edu/flow_cytometry>
phone: 734-647-3216  fax: 734-936-7376
kukuru@umich.edu



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 10 2001 - 19:31:07 EST