Re: Proliferationmarker for lymphocytes

From: Howard Shapiro (hms@shapirolab.com)
Date: Sat Jan 08 2000 - 17:33:44 EST


Juergen Ostwald asks whether there are better markers for proliferating 
lymphocytes than Ki-67 and PCNA.  Although I do not have a large-scale 
study to support this, I would expect that CD71, the transferrin receptor, 
which is a surface marker and hence easier to detect than Ki-67 or PCNA, 
would be as good.  In my experience, stimulated lymphocytes which are 
found, based on elevated RNA content as detected by pyronin Y staining, to 
be in proliferative (G1A,G1B, S, G2, and M) phases of the cell cycle, 
invariably also express CD71, while quiescent cells (in G0, otherwise 
called G1Q), do not.  Of course, the distinction between "positive" and 
"negative" with any of the activation markers is less clear than, say, 
discrimination of CD4+ and CD4- populations in peripheral blood 
lymphocytes.  Ki-67, PCNA, and CD71 all have the advantage of persisting 
throughout the period of proliferation, as opposed to CD69, which appears 
early but typically disappears by 48 hours, while proliferation continues.

-Howard



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 10 2001 - 19:31:02 EST