RE: PE or APC

From: Dr. Robert Ashcroft (cytomat@netcore.com.au)
Date: Thu Nov 11 1999 - 21:03:45 EST


Interesting comment there Howard.
It may allow some people with multi-line Argon lasers to use the 528.7nm
line for PE, losing FITC of course.
Bob



-----Original Message-----
From:	Howard Shapiro [mailto:hms@shapirolab.com]
Sent:	Thursday, 11 November 1999 14:32
To:	Cytometry Mailing List
Subject:	Re: PE or APC



>
>>Who can tell me? What is better to detect a rare molecule: one molecule of
>>PE or one molecule of APC?

Mario Roederer, in a well thought-out and comprehensive answer to this
question, pointed out:

>
>In a vacuum of background fluorescence, PE
>would be the choice, since it carries more fluors than does APC.
>However, if you are measuring against a cell, then APC would probably
>be the winner, since the background autofluorescence is much lower.
>

That's true if you use 488 nm excitation for PE; however, if you use 532 nm
excitation (doubled YAG laser), there is almost no autofluorescence (from
mammalian cells), and the pendulum swings back toward PE.

-Howard



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 03 2002 - 11:54:13 EST