Re: No BD Service Contract = slower response?

From: Steve G. Hilliard (steve@habanero.cb.uga.edu)
Date: Fri Sep 03 1999 - 14:48:49 EST


Elaine,

We're an all Coulter shop, and dropped our contract 2 yrs ago.  I can't
say that service calls take any longer now (we've only had 1 or 2), and 
phone support is consistently excellent, but I _will_ say that we don't
get any extras.  When we were on contract our service rep was always 
stopping by to check on us, and often helped us out w/ parts or
preventative maintenance.  Now I never see him unless I call.  I guess
that's understandable, but it does make me miss the contract.  Don't miss
the expense though!

Steve

On Fri, 3 Sep 1999, Elaine Kunze wrote:

> 
> Could anyone with Beckman-Coulter experience answer as well?   (slower
> response if no service contract).
> 
> 
> At 02:52 PM 9/1/99 -0400, you wrote:
> >
> >Fellow flowers and BD instrument users,
> >
> >In the never ending quest to decrease instrument costs we are exploring the
> >possibility of dropping the relatively expensive BD service contracts
> >(BDSC) on our FACScan and TSO Vantage for something called the "University
> >Hospital Consortium Capital Asset Management Program" (CAMP).
> >
> >The CAMP program appears to be a "self-insured" style of effort where,
> >instead of paying BD, we would pay the CAMP general fund a lesser amount
> >(40 - 80% less than BD!) each year. Should a machine require repair service
> >or routine preventative maintenance we could simply call BD and request
> >service or maintenance as usual and the cost of these repairs or
> >maintenance is covered by CAMP. According to the information, there is no
> >prior "approval" process required by CAMP.
> >
> >On the face of it, CAMP appears to offer a tremendous savings over the BDSC
> >and seems to be a no brainer. Under CAMP, we would continue to receive the
> >excellent (in our experience) BD service at reduced cost, without the delay
> >of an up front, third party approval process.
> >
> >Yet, there may be a darker side to this equation. Without the official BDSC
> >we fear we may fall prey to vastly increased response times from our BD
> >Field Service Engineers (FSE). It has been reported that so called
> >"billable accounts" ie; those folks not on a BDSC, are placed "on the
> >bottom of the priority visit list" by a FSE - and that this may in fact be
> >a BD company policy.
> >
> >So, my question is have any of you out there in BD flow land without a BDSC
> >experienced slowed service call response times? If so could you please
> >relate your experiences and opinions.
> >
> >Thanks in advance,
> >
> ><+>:<+>:<+>:<+>:<+>:<+>:<+>:<+>:<+>:<+>:<+>:<+>
> >Barry Grimes
> >FACS Laboratory Manager
> >Hematopoiesis Center
> >Univ. of Kentucky Medical Center
> >Blood and Marrow Transplant
> >Rm.cc418 Markey Cancer Center
> >800 Rose St, Lexington,KY 40536-0093
> >lab) 606-323-8193
> >fax) 606-257-7715
> >e-mail) bagrim1@pop.uky.edu
> ><+>:<+>:<+>:<+>:<+>:<+>:<+>:<+>:<+>:<+>:<+>:<+>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ****************************************************************************
> 	Elaine Kunze
> 	Flow Cytometry.....Image Analysis...
> 	The Biotechnology Institute for Research and Education
> 	Life Sciences Consortium
> 	8B Althouse Laboratory  (814-863-2762)
> 	Penn State University
> 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Steve G. Hilliard                 (706) 542-9474
University of Georgia Cell Analysis Facility
flowman@uga.edu	     URL:  http://floweb.cb.uga.edu/Floweb/
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 03 2002 - 11:53:56 EST