backbones

From: Bill Hyun (hyun@cc.ucsf.edu)
Date: Thu Aug 19 1999 - 10:39:10 EST


Hello,
I would like to pose a question to those of you that connect your
cytometers, flow and/or image, to a data backbone. If you were starting
from scratch and were given the choice between LINUX or Windows NT, which
environment would you choose and why?
Now, I don't want to get into holy wars about whether Mr. Gates is a god or
the devil...I am wondering about the practical issues and whether there are
fundamental advantages or disadvantages for either as the OS for a running
a data backbone in the cytometry world. For the "end user," the guy sitting
at either the FACScan Mac or a PC hooked up to a microscope, he/she can
"see" either backbone to drag and drop files for archive and backup...and
probably doesn't care which platform is supporting the server...except when
it doesn't work!  Functionally, both NT and LINUX use the same generic PC
hardware, so costs seem about the same. Are there still
stability/reliability issues? Has anyone switched from one to other? Or
contemplating a switch?
I'll be interested in your replies...if desired, I'd be happy to summarize
any results.
Thanks.
-Bill

*****************************
William Hyun, Director
Laboratory for Cell Analysis
UCSF Cancer Center, Room S129
San Francisco, CA  94143-0808

Office (415)476-2632
Lab (415)476-2631
FAX (415)476-8218
email hyun@cc.ucsf.edu

Deliveries:
2340 Sutter Street, Room S129
San Francisco, CA 94115



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 03 2002 - 11:53:52 EST