re: luminex/bead assay survey

From: Bunny Cotleur (bcotleur@ohio.net)
Date: Wed May 19 1999 - 22:00:54 EST


Several weeks ago I posted a query  concerning Luminex Corp multiplexed
beads technology.
Several people have written back, this is a digest of the 15+ responses
I rec'd:

1. Overall, most labs liked the assay, but had many problems setting up
the assays, Most felt they spent a great deal of time "tweaking" the
bead coating and cytometer setups.
 
2. I received more negative feedback from labs that used these beads on
their normal flow cytometers. On a regular flow cytometer, compensation
and signal bleedover were the most frequent reported  pronblems.

3. The most positive responses came from labs that used the beads with 
Luminex's own Instrument. At a MINIMUM it has been suggested to at least
buy their software/workstation (and run the cytometer from this).

4. Most labs reported very positive dealings with the company itself.  I
will say- I have contacted them twice about demo's and have NEVER had a
response. I also had to phone to get literature sent to me- email did
not seem to catch their attention.

5. One lab reported it took them MONTHS to set-up an on-site demo.

6. The instrumentation they market now seems to be rather new to them.
When pressed, they came up with 4 labs that had them installed.

Conclusion: a promising technology, but definitely NOT kit-ready. You
will spend a great deal of time (especially if you test serum)
establishing your assay parameters.  If you are pressed for time- you
would be better served weaiting on this technology. If you have the time
to work out tweaks & bugs- go for it.

OH- and prece:  The beads are somewhat pricey. Running few beads sets
does not save money (over traditional ELISA techniques).  Once you start
expanding the bead populations, the cost goes down.

There are 2 labs that have told me they have papers (in press)
discussing their experiences with this technology.


Bunny Cotleur
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Neurosciences



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 03 2002 - 11:53:30 EST