Re: WIN-FCM and EXPO

From: Larry Arnold (lwarma@med.unc.edu)
Date: Fri Apr 30 1999 - 10:02:25 EST


Doug and Mark

You should seriously take a look at the Cytomation Cicero system if you
want your FACScan interfaced to a PC running NT.  The new Summit software
will be out soon to power it and it will be a superb software package.

Larry

>Douglas S. Smoot wrote: and Mark KuKuruga resonded:
>
>> 1) We feel we need to upgrade our FACScan computer to something better than
>> the HP and something that is Y2K compliant.  We are a PC based lab, so we
>> don't really want to have a lone MAC operating the flow cytometer.
>
>I think this is a non-issue.  FCS formats as a given, data transfer between
>platforms is simply a matter of linking to a LAN.  We have Coulter software
>generated data sets (Elite and System II) that are often re-analyzed in
>CellQuest, and Scan data the reverse.  And . . . both are readable by third
>party software (I use WinMDI . . . Thanks Joe).
>I just recently took delivery of a Vantage SE, so I'll have two Elite
ESPs, an
>EPICS XL, along with the two MAC workstations running . . . they'll just
have to
>learn to get along.
>
>> 2) We also have a Coulter Elite, and we are interested in purchasing the
EXPO
>> software to run our Elite and our XL.  Is there any current experience with
>> the latest version?  How does it work?  Is it worth the upgrade?  I am
happy
>> with the DOS system, but technology marches on, and I would hate to be
left in
>> the dust.
>
>I have similar concerns.  I've seen demos of these programs, but until you
>actually have them running in real acquisition mode, generating and saving
data,
>you can't say.  The problem is that very little is said about these programs.
>I've queried this group several times on this very subject, with a response
>remarkable for its silence.
>The problem here, is "just how far do you go?"  If you want to run EXPO, it's
>not just "not DOS," but also Windows.  So, two changes are necessary . . .
>I'm recently thinking that WinNT might be a better way to go ultimately.
I've
>heard that NT tends to be more stable and predictable.  Problem . . . the
Elite
>workstations (I have two Pentium 90s) may not be strong enough to run NT.  If
>it's Win95 (or 98, if you want), then I still want some feedback before I
>upgrade BOTH the operating system AND the acquisition software.  Lacking
for a
>response from any voice of experience, however, one of us may just have to
take
>a leap of faith . . .
>MAK.
>--
>Mark A. KuKuruga, Managing Director
>University of Michigan Core Flow Cytometry
>kukuruga@medmail.med.umich.edu
> 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 03 2002 - 11:53:26 EST