Re: ca++ flux quandry

From: Steve Perfetto (sperfetto@hiv.hjf.org)
Date: Thu Dec 18 1997 - 09:26:52 EST


Mark,

Ionomycin is a radical insult on the ion CA+2 channels and in many of our
experiments with many cell types rarely drop to baseline over our time
parameter.  However,  one should always run a biological control which should
return your cells to baseline.  Good controls are; X-linking the biotinylated
Anti-CD3 with avidin or using CD2/2R (Becton Dickinson) which is a clone mixture
which naturally causes x-linking.  In all biological control systems these
should return to baseline.

Stephen P. Perfetto, MS.,MT. (ASCP)
Walter Reed Army Institute of Research
Department of Molecular Diagnostics and Pathogenesis
1600 East Gude Drive
Rockville, MD. 20850

_______________________________________________________________________________
Subject: ca++ flux quandry
From:    KUKURUGA@medmail.med.umich.edu at Internet_Gateway
Date:    12/17/97  3:12 PM


Here's a good one (maybe) . . . 
Jurkat cells, loaded with indo, hit with ionomycin (1ug/ml).  The ratio inverts
showing good ca++ flux, yet after a minute or so, the ratio returns to 
baseline.  So, what does it mean?  Is the ionomycin concentration perhaps too
high, and therefore toxic, thus causing cell death?  What do you think?

Also . . . same cells, transfected with whatever, but co-transfected to be 
neomycin resistant . . . under above conditions (indo loaded, ionomycin
treated)the ratio moves in the unbound direction, exxentially backwards
from
expected.  Could this be due to the resistance, and a loading issue?
Any thoughts will be appreciated.

MAK.

---
Mark A. KuKuruga, Managing Director
University of Michigan Flow Cytometry
kukuruga@medmail.med.umich.edu



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 03 2002 - 11:50:26 EST