Comment on Ellen Ko's message

From: Walter Sharp (denby@compuserve.com)
Date: Fri Mar 21 1997 - 03:27:50 EST


I was going to reply "privately" but feel that others may want to comment
on my comments !

It seems strange to me that the talk about MPO "background staining" is
being looked at as simply that.
Most other commercial and in house methods are actually INDUCING the
activity by releasing the enzyme from Neutrophil lineage cells which then
gets drawn into the target population.
No amount of blocking will help in this case.
How An der Grub "prevent" this I do not know but it may have something to
do with the tremendous amount of "autofluorescence" seen after
permeablisation compared to, say, a Triton method.
Maybe a sort of covering-up effect.
Nevertheless, it does seem to work consistently with MPO.
As for TdT - I would argue the point that it doesn't work at all but I
would be the first to agree that you can get better results with harsher
permeablisation methods.
Just in case anyone thinks I'm "having a go" at Dako - we use their
excellent anti MPO and the HT6  TdT clone marketed by them (? Supertech in
the states).

Wal Sharp
SQU
Oman.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 03 2002 - 11:49:34 EST