Re: long-term storage

From: Ivan T. Shaw (ishaw@po-box.mcgill.ca)
Date: Thu Mar 13 1997 - 16:50:52 EST


At 12:14 AM 3/13/97 -0500, you wrote:
>I debated which system to use, and decided on the ZIP drive.  Each disk
>holds 100 Mb, and the drives themselves are inexpensive enough to be
>an attractive addition to any computer.  Jazz drives would also be good,
>but the larger size is worrysome, as is the size of the CD-R method.  We
>used to use a Worm optical (600 Mb per side) . . . imagine losing that
>much data on a corrupted disk -- it happens.  100 meg at a time seems
>more managable.

This is a good argument for the ZIPdrive. However, for long-term storage, I
have a problem with using magnetic media; your files can get wiped by stray
fields.

I think that a hierarchical storage system may be the better way to go; ZIP
(or EZ-Flyer for those people who prefer SyQuest hardware) for short-term,
CDR for long-term and WORM for those dead files.


- ivan

======================================================================
Ivan T. Shaw                      | Tel: (514) 398-3002
Montreal Neurological Institute   | FAX: (514) 398-8540 
3801 University                   | e-mail: ishaw@po-box.mcgill.ca
Montreal, Quebec, CANADA  H3A 2B4 | http://132.206.201.7/ivan/ivan.htm
======================================================================



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 03 2002 - 11:49:33 EST