WORKSHOP FINDINGS,
RECOMMENDATIONS, AND
AGENCY RESPONSES
This section summarizes the six major findings and recommendations
that emerged during the workshop, and the responses to date from ATSDR,
CDC, FDA, and the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
1. PERFORM ADDITIONAL STUDIES WITH A
STANDARD CASE DEFINITION
Finding
The 11 cases described require more complete laboratory
characterization to see if they satisfy stringent criteria for a case definition
of BCML. Additional studies in other cohorts using the case definition
for BCML are also required.
Recommendation
Establish a case definition based on laboratory criteria,
then re-analyze samples from the cases and from other cohorts.
Agency Response
A case definition of BCML, as assessed by kappa/lambda
analysis and/or a PCR-based detection of rearranged immunoglobulin heavy
chain genes, has been established. A protocol (see Chapter 23) to characterize
the eleven cases presented at the workshop and other individuals with high
B-cell counts is in progress.
2. EVALUATE ENVIRONMENTAL RISK FACTORS
Finding
Additional studies in well-defined exposure cohorts
are required to investigate an association between BCML and exposure to
environmental chemicals.
Recommendations
(1) Explore the possibility of using existing data sets
to test the association between people living near hazardous waste sites
and their risk for CLL or NHL.
(2) Develop a questionnaire specifically addressing
environmental risk factors among subjects with BCML, B-CLL or NHL and among
control subjects.
(3) Design additional cohort and case-control studies,
including prospective longitudinal studies, to confirm findings and assess
genetic and environmental risk factors.
Agency Response
(1) A joint protocol (see Chapter 22) to combine NCI
data sets with ATSDR geographic information on hazardous waste site locations
has been submitted for Institutional Review Board approval.
(2) A questionnaire focusing on environmental risk
factors and confounding variables is being developed (see Chapter 24).
(3) Exposure cohorts (such as the ATSDR benzene
and trichloroethylene exposure registries) are being explored as candidates
for additional studies.
3. DETERMINE THE NATURAL HISTORY OF BCML
Finding
The data presented on individuals with BCML followed
longitudinally (see Chapter 6) validate BCML as a risk factor for B-CLL,
but further analysis of these data and continued follow-up of this and
other cohorts are necessary in order to determine the proportion of BCML
that develops into B-CLL or other malignancies.
Recommendation
Conduct epidemiological review of the data acquired
from the cohort described in Chapter 6 and update the data through continued
follow-up of this cohort. Conduct new studies designed with a longitudinal
component for follow-up.
Agency Response
This will require specific support at the agency or
department level to provide competitive funding for peer-reviewed proposals.
4. CONDUCT STRATIFIED PREVALENCE STUDIES
Finding
Data from these ATSDR studies and from independent investigations
(see Chapter 10) suggest that the prevalence of BCML in a normal population
of people above age 40 maybe on the order of 1%. This surprisingly high
value must be confirmed and evaluated in demographically representative
populations.
Recommendation
Develop the most effective screening procedures for
evaluating the prevalence of BCML in large population studies. These procedures
could should be designed for use in a randomized survey such as the Health
and Nutrition Evaluation Survey (HANES).
Agency Response
CBER/FDA and EHLS/CDC will jointly develop the optimal
screening procedures. The application of such procedures awaits technical
development and the opportunity for collaboration with ongoing studies.
5. STANDARDIZE LABORATORY METHODS
Finding
Consistent laboratory characterization of BCML will
require the use of inter-laboratory studies to validate methods, establish
technical sources of variability, and ensure laboratory proficiency.
Recommendations
Validate kappa/lambda analysis with methods that use
at least two labeled antibodies and preferably three labeled antibodies
to identify B-cells, kappa, and lambda expression. Single parameter (color)
analyses are not recom-mended. Use B-cell “gating” (either live or
software gates) to improve sensitivity. Establish a network to coordinate
inter-laboratory studies.
Agency Response
CBER/FDA and EHLS/CDC will help develop standards for
kappa/lambda analyses and PCR techniques used in heavy chain analysis.
6. ADDRESS MEDICAL AND ETHICAL ISSUES
Finding
Because neither the clinical significance of BCML nor
the prognosis of individuals with BCML is predictable at this time, the
decision to report findings of BCML to study participants raises ethical
questions, and our lack of knowledge about BCML reinforces the need for
medical follow-up.
Recommendation
Ideally, an established centralized clinical facility
such as the Family Studies Section Outpatient Clinic, NCI, NIH would follow
and advise individuals identified with BCML in federally-supported studies.
The larger ethical issues involved in identifying BCML should be closely
examined and compared with issues involved in identifying risk factors
for other diseases such as the use genetic markers to identify an increased
risk of breast cancer. Findings from
the inter-agency workgroup in the Ethical, Legal and Social Issues
branch of the National Center for Human Genome Research should be considered
in the context of BCML.
Agency Response
ATSDR medical officers had already contacted all participants
identified as having a B-CLL-like phenotype and encouraged them to discuss
these results with their personal physicians. In addition, ATSDR offered
to help transport the 3 people with documented monoclonality to the outpatient
clinic of the Family Studies Section, NCI, NIH. Arrangements for future
studies are currently under discussion. Future studies should include consideration
by an Institutional Review Board on the need for clinical follow-up and
individual notification.
Return To Contents