RE: Principle of detecting apoptosis

Tom Mc Closkey (thomasm@nshs.edu)
Tue, 22 Oct 96 17:23:18 PDT

On Mon, 21 Oct 1996 08:25:21 +0300 (WET) Yashpal Agrawal wrote:
>

> Annexin V staining is becoming popular for detecting
>apoptotic cells.
>1. How does one exclude that the surface PS that one is detecting is not
>the normal component of cell membrane ?
>(I know non-nucleated cells (red blood cells) express PS, and also
>many nucleated cells (Cd34+) express PS).
>
>2. If an increase/decrease in Annexin V staining occurs, how can it be
>excluded that PS levels have not been up/down regulated, in contrast to
>assuming apoptosis as the cause. Membrane phospholipids flip-flop all the
>time in response to various modifiers.
>
I agree with you. My hesitation in using the annexin assay is the lack of a
good control molecule to determine:

1] amount of specific binding to non apoptotic cells [as you suggested]

2] amount of nonspecific binding to non apoptotic cells

In contrast, we have found TUNEL to be a very specific assay.

-------------------------------------
Name: Tom Mc Closkey
E-mail: thomasm@nshs.edu
Date: 10/22/96
Time: 17:31:17

This message was sent by Chameleon
-------------------------------------
Thomas W. Mc Closkey, Ph. D.
Director, Flow Cytometry
North Shore University Hospital
Cornell University Medical College
Manhasset, Long Island, New York
ph: 516-562-4641 fax: 516-562-2866
e-mail: thomasm@nshs.edu


Home Page Table of Contents Sponsors Web Sites
CD ROM Vol 2 was produced by staff at the Purdue University Cytometry Laboratories and distributed free of charge as an educational service to the cytometry community. If you have any comments please direct them to Dr. J. Paul Robinson, Professor & Director, PUCL, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907. Phone:(317) 494-0757; FAX (317) 494-0517; Web http://www.cyto.purdue.edu EMAIL robinson@flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu