QE & ET

Thomas Delohery (t-delohery@ski.mskcc.org)
Tue, 19 Dec 1995 16:26:53 +0530

I take exception to Mike Solomn's characterization of the exchange
between Mario Roederer and Mark Edinger as:
"somewhat acrimonious and rather pointless disputes about energy
transfer semantics even worse."

Anyone who thinks that the difference between quantum efficiency and
energy transfer is a semantic one doesn't know what they are talking about.
To equate the two processes is sloppy thinking at best. It is a disservice
to the readers of this bulletin board to allow such information be posted
without a rebuttal.

Mario Roederer is correct in describing quantum efficiency as the number
of photons emitted divided by the number of photons absorbed. Since
energy transfer is a non-radiative process, quantum efficiency can NOT
be a measure of energy transfer.

Regarding the tone of some of the posts on this bulletin board, I rather
enjoy a heated debate as long as the facts are presented correctly.

td

Simple answers are for simple minds.

--
==============================================================================
 Thomas Delohery                        | Internet: t-delohery@ski.mskcc.org
 Manager, Flow Cytometry Core Facility  |    Phone: (212) 639-8729
 Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center |      Fax: (212) 794-4019
 1275 York Ave. Box 98                  |
 New York, NY    10021                  |
==============================================================================
 


Home Page Table of Contents Sponsors Web Sites
CD ROM Vol 2 was produced by staff at the Purdue University Cytometry Laboratories and distributed free of charge as an educational service to the cytometry community. If you have any comments please direct them to Dr. J. Paul Robinson, Professor & Director, PUCL, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907. Phone:(317) 494-0757; FAX (317) 494-0517; Web http://www.cyto.purdue.edu EMAIL robinson@flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu