Re: background subtraction

FACS_COPY@wehi.edu.au
Thu, 09 Nov 1995 10:07:50 +1000

Alice,

Yes, I think you have the background subtraction *formula* right.
Begin with the assumption that the isotype control spillover into
the positive region is due to a random selection of the cells which
will be distributed after staining in the same proportions as the
rest. That is, instead of subtracting *all* the spillover, just take
off an appropriate fraction:

y = x - c(1 - y/100)

y = actual % +ve
x = measured % +ve
c = measured % +ve for isotype control

which rearranges to your equation. However, can I suggest two extra
considerations:

1: Is the assumption correct? Are the spillover cells random or are
they predominately one cell type (large, sticky, autofluorescent..)?
Thus, maybe all or none will be specifically stained in the positive
sample (depending on the actual stain and the actual sample).

2: You give the example of a positive sample 100% brightly stained.
If "brightly" means way above the cutoff point that gave the value
"c" for the isotype control, you may get another answer using a higher
cutoff point for both control and sample.

(I don't have the answers, just the questions)

Regards, | | < Frank: battye@wehi.edu.au
\__/ <<<<< The Walter & Eliza Hall Institute
---------------!!<<<<<<<< Post Office, Royal Melbourne Hospital
/!!\ <<<<< Victoria 3050, Australia
o !! \ < ph: 61_3_9345 2541, fax: 61_3_9347 0852


Home Page Table of Contents Sponsors Web Sites
CD ROM Vol 2 was produced by staff at the Purdue University Cytometry Laboratories and distributed free of charge as an educational service to the cytometry community. If you have any comments please direct them to Dr. J. Paul Robinson, Professor & Director, PUCL, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907. Phone:(317) 494-0757; FAX (317) 494-0517; Web http://www.cyto.purdue.edu EMAIL robinson@flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu