Detection of Cy5

FACS_COPY@wehi.edu.au
Mon, 06 Nov 1995 14:37:08 +1000

Following on Colette's Cy5 Question and David's reply, we'd like to
get David or others to expand on what's been said. The background to
our question is as follows:

We recently needed to run samples stained with FITC, Tricolor and
Texas Red, a choice forced on us by availability of reagents. We
avoided the problem of 2nd laser excitation of Tricolor and its spill
into the Texas Red channel by treating the Tricolor like Cy5, exciting
it with the 2nd laser, which then allowed us to compensate against
Texas Red. Used this way the signal/background looked about as good
as Tricolor excited with laser1. Yet we see very few people reporting
results using Cy5 itself. Which brings us to the question: In
*actual* laboratory bench terms, how does Cy5 compare to APC (when
excited sub-optimally by dye laser at 605nm) for:

a: Ease and stability of conjugation.
b: Intensity of fluorescence.

And further, how does Cy3 compare to PE in the same terms.

It would seem there may sometimes be advantages in Cy3 and Cy5 being
so much smaller molecules than the phycobilis

\ / < Flow Systems Laboratory
Frank Battye \__/ <<<<< The Walter & Eliza Hall Institute
Robyn Muir ----------!!<<<<<<<< Voice: 61_3_9345 2540
Dora Constantinou /!!\ <<<<< Fax: 61_3_9347 0852
o !! \ < IN:: "facs_copy@wehi.edu.au"


Home Page Table of Contents Sponsors Web Sites
CD ROM Vol 2 was produced by staff at the Purdue University Cytometry Laboratories and distributed free of charge as an educational service to the cytometry community. If you have any comments please direct them to Dr. J. Paul Robinson, Professor & Director, PUCL, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907. Phone:(317) 494-0757; FAX (317) 494-0517; Web http://www.cyto.purdue.edu EMAIL robinson@flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu