Re: ALERT:NIH SUPPORT

David Galbraith (dgalbrai@ag.Arizona.EDU)
Tue, 23 May 1995 22:52:45 -0700 (MST)

My thought is if we lose significant funding for the NIH, there won't be
any money for purchasing flow cytometers. But without our major commercial
suppliers, where would we be? -- and I know it's a love-hate
relationship!

David Galbraith

P.S. Q. Old joke: why don't the English sell flow cytometers?
A. They haven't figured out how to make them leak sheath fluid!

SORRY if I've offended anyone (or used up (gosh!) bandwidth!)

On Tue, 23 May 1995 kukuruga%kasle1.dnet@rocdec.roc.wayne.edu wrote:

> Quick response to Nigel Blackhall's comments...
>
> Following your logic, your message was totally inappropriate for this mailing
> list, as it had nothing to do with cytometry...so, why did you send it?
>
> Beyond that, two points...clearly, while this topic may be of direct
> interest to a "subset", it has the potential for international ramifications,
> and....given the extent of contribution Dr. Darzynkiewicz has made to
> cytometry in general, I believe he's allowed to "Stretch" the bandwidth
> on occasion.
>
> MAK.
>


Home Page Table of Contents Sponsors Web Sites
CD ROM Vol 2 was produced by staff at the Purdue University Cytometry Laboratories and distributed free of charge as an educational service to the cytometry community. If you have any comments please direct them to Dr. J. Paul Robinson, Professor & Director, PUCL, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907. Phone:(317) 494-0757; FAX (317) 494-0517; Web http://www.cyto.purdue.edu EMAIL robinson@flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu